Photochemotherapy in human heart transplant recipients at high risk for fatal rejection.

Heart transplant recipients in whom high levels of lymphocytotoxic antibodies directed towards a spectrum of histocompatibility antigens develop frequently represent difficult management problems. Recipients of multiple transplants and multiparous females generally form higher levels of panel reactive antibodies, which have been associated with fatal rejection episodes and accelerated graft atherosclerosis. In this study, two multiple transplant patients with preexistent high levels of panel reactive antibodies and two multiparous women who were considered at risk of sensitization were treated with a new form of immunotherapy termed photochemotherapy in addition to conventional immunosuppression. High levels of panel reactive antibodies have been reduced, and patients have suffered few rejection episodes and no infectious complications. This preliminary experience shows that the addition of photochemotherapy to conventional regimens may improve the clinical course of hypersensitized transplant patients without additional immunosuppressive risk.
BACKGROUND:
There is no standard definition for “HLA incompatible” transplants. For the first time, we systematically assessed how HLA incompatibility was defined in contemporary peer-reviewed publications and its prognostic implication to transplant outcomes.
 
METHODS:
We combined 2 independent searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from 2015 to 2019. Content-expert reviewers screened for original research on outcomes of HLA-incompatible transplants (defined as allele or molecular mismatch and solid-phase or cell-based assays). We ascertained the completeness of reporting on a predefined set of variables assessing HLA incompatibility, therapies, and outcomes. Given significant heterogeneity, we conducted narrative synthesis and assessed risk of bias in studies examining the association between death-censored graft failure and HLA incompatibility.
 
RESULTS:
Of 6656 screened articles, 163 evaluated transplant outcomes by HLA incompatibility. Most articles reported on cytotoxic/flow T-cell crossmatches (n = 98). Molecular genotypes were reported for selected loci at the allele-group level. Sixteen articles reported on epitope compatibility. Pretransplant donor-specific HLA antibodies were often considered (n = 143); yet there was heterogeneity in sample handling, assay procedure, and incomplete reporting on donor-specific HLA antibodies assignment. Induction (n = 129) and maintenance immunosuppression (n = 140) were frequently mentioned but less so rejection treatment (n = 72) and desensitization (n = 70). Studies assessing death-censored graft failure risk by HLA incompatibility were vulnerable to bias in the participant, predictor, and analysis domains.
 
CONCLUSIONS:
Optimization of transplant outcomes and personalized care depends on accurate HLA compatibility assessment. Reporting on a standard set of variables will help assess generalizability of research, allow knowledge synthesis, and facilitate international collaboration in clinical trials.
 
Â