- Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 1996 Aug; 107(2):235-42.
The anti-tumor action of many chemotherapeutic agents has recently been attributed to the induction of apoptosis in the malignant cell population. In this study, we investigated the ability of extracorporeal photopheresis (ExP) and in vitro PUVA (8-methoxy-psoralen + ultraviolet A) therapy to induce apoptosis in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from Sezary syndrome patients and normal controls. Flow cytometric analysis of ExP- or PUVA-treated peripheral blood lymphocytes demonstrated two distinct cell populations within 24 h of treatment. One population was similar to untreated controls with the other exhibiting characteristics of apoptotic cell death, i.e., a loss of cell volume and an accompanying increase in cell density. This latter population was comprised of cells with DNA strand breaks as determined by the Tdt-mediated deoxyuridine triphosphate-biotin nick end labeling assay. Apoptosis was also confirmed morphologically by fluorescent and electron microscopy as well as by demonstration of characteristic DNA strand breaks (laddering) using gel electrophoresis. Apoptosis was not observed with 8-methoxypsoralen (< or = 300 ng per ml) alone; however, ultraviolet A alone at doses > or = 2 J per cm2 induced apoptosis in lymphocytes. Peripheral blood T-cell subpopulations of Sezary syndrome patients, including the malignant clone, were equally susceptible to apoptosis subsequent to either photopheresis or PUVA treatment. In contrast, monocytes (CD14+/CD45+) appear to be resistant to apoptosis induction by ExP or PUVA treatment. Moreover, ExP-treated and untreated monocytes phagocytized apoptotic, but not untreated, peripheral blood mononuclear cells. ExP and PUVA have been shown to be efficacious and well-tolerated therapies in the treatment of dermatologic diseases and transplant rejection. These data suggest that induction of apoptosis may be an important event for therapeutic efficacy.
BACKGROUND:
There is no standard definition for “HLA incompatible” transplants. For the first time, we systematically assessed how HLA incompatibility was defined in contemporary peer-reviewed publications and its prognostic implication to transplant outcomes.
Â
METHODS:
We combined 2 independent searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from 2015 to 2019. Content-expert reviewers screened for original research on outcomes of HLA-incompatible transplants (defined as allele or molecular mismatch and solid-phase or cell-based assays). We ascertained the completeness of reporting on a predefined set of variables assessing HLA incompatibility, therapies, and outcomes. Given significant heterogeneity, we conducted narrative synthesis and assessed risk of bias in studies examining the association between death-censored graft failure and HLA incompatibility.
Â
RESULTS:
Of 6656 screened articles, 163 evaluated transplant outcomes by HLA incompatibility. Most articles reported on cytotoxic/flow T-cell crossmatches (n = 98). Molecular genotypes were reported for selected loci at the allele-group level. Sixteen articles reported on epitope compatibility. Pretransplant donor-specific HLA antibodies were often considered (n = 143); yet there was heterogeneity in sample handling, assay procedure, and incomplete reporting on donor-specific HLA antibodies assignment. Induction (n = 129) and maintenance immunosuppression (n = 140) were frequently mentioned but less so rejection treatment (n = 72) and desensitization (n = 70). Studies assessing death-censored graft failure risk by HLA incompatibility were vulnerable to bias in the participant, predictor, and analysis domains.
Â
CONCLUSIONS:
Optimization of transplant outcomes and personalized care depends on accurate HLA compatibility assessment. Reporting on a standard set of variables will help assess generalizability of research, allow knowledge synthesis, and facilitate international collaboration in clinical trials.
Â
Â
